|
Post Menopausal Tests - Object Oriented Case Studies
_________________________________________________________
Post Menopausal Hormone Status
Post Menopausal Hormone Status Case Study 1
Purpose
To demonstrate sufficiency of Estrogen and deficiency of Progesterone
in post
menopausal women.
Background
A significant number of women in late peri-menopause & early menopause
have significant levels of bioactive estrogens in spite of somatic symptoms.
A number of symptoms are due to continued cycling of Estradiol. It is
our experience that simultaneous assessment of E2 and P1 levels should
be performed. The use of the E2 free fraction in saliva is especially
important because it is the bioactive fraction of E2 and represents a
miniscule 1-1.5% of the total serum
E2 content (1). The bioactive E2 concentration is not necessarily reflected
in total serum E2 measurements. (2).
Remarks
DHEA, Testosterone, E1, E2, and E3 were adequate. P1 was below physiological
target level. P1/E2 Ratio favors Estrogen dominance which pre-disposes
women to:
1. A proliferative state affecting mammary and uterine tissue.
2. Reduced inhibitory (GABA) effect in CNS; a pro-excitatory state.
3. Tendency to reduced osteoblastic activity with bone loss.
| Patient
Specific Data |
|
| Age:
53 yrs Female |
Bone
Desitometry: 11% bone loss |
| Last
period: 5yrs earlier |
Somatic
Expressions: Mild hot flashes, |
| Mental
& Emotional: Low libido, iemotional
instability, delayed sleep ionset |
|
| Lab
Report |
xxx |
| Patient
Salivary Hormone Level |
Physiologic
Target Range |
| DHEA:
4ng/ml |
3-10
ng/ml |
| Testosterone:
17 pg/ml |
8-20
pg/ml |
| Estrone,
E1: 40 pg/ml |
26-64
pg/ml |
| Estradiol,
E2: 11 pg/ml |
5-13
pg/ml |
| Estriol,
E3: 4pg/ml |
4-10
pg/ml |
| Progesterone:
32 pg/ml |
100-300
pg/ml |
Case Management Hormone Aspect
õ No Estrogens were given.
õ 35 mg BID of isomolecular Progesterone
daily.
õ Retesting with the PHP1 to validate
treatment 60 days later showed
xiacceptable levels of all hormones and minimal
somatic symptoms.xxxxxxxxxxssReferences
Estrogen Overdosing
Case Study 2
Purpose
To demonstrate the typical overdosing of estrogen in post menopausal women
during attempts to control somatic symptoms, including hot flushes.
| Patient
Specific Data |
|
| Age:
50yrs Female |
|
| Last
Period: 3 yrs earlier |
i |
| Bone
density changes: minimal |
i |
Initial
Symptoms: Hot flushes, emotional
iinstability, lack of concentration |
|
| Treatment:
The patient was placed on Estrogen patches 3 months earlier |
i |
| Outcome:
Control of all somatic symptoms, increased aggression and irritability,
with tender breasts |
|
| Lab
Report |
|
| Patient
salivary hormone level |
Physiologic
Target Ranges |
| DHEA:
6ng/ml |
3-10
ng/ml |
| Testosterone:
27pg/ml |
8-20
pg/nl |
| Estrone:
36 pg/ml |
26-64
pg/nl |
| Estradiol:
45 pg/ml |
5-13
pg/nl |
| Estriol:
16 pg/ml |
4-10
pg/nl |
| Progesterone:
53 pg/ml |
100-300
pg/nl |
Estrogen Overdosing
Case Study 2 (continued)
Background
Many late and early post-menopausal women are given estrogens of various
types & preparations to control somatic symptoms, including hot flushes.
The physiochemical anatomy of a hot flush consists of a rapid drop in
estrogen over a few days with low progesterone. It is not a dearth in
the absolute value of estrogen. Consequently, the continual estrogen treatment
will overdose the woman while it mitigates somatic symptoms; it blunts
the rapid fluctuations in Estrogen by overriding endogenous production.
Remarks
Sufficient DHEA and Testosterone, mild E3 excess, unacceptable
elevation in Estradiol level, P1 is below physiologic target level. The
induced Estrogen excess (about 400%) coupled with low Progesterone renders
women very proliferative and increases aggressive behavior
and irritability.
Case Management
Hormonal Aspect
õ Estrogen dose cut by 2/3 to prevent
override.
õ 35 mg BID of isomolecular Progesterone.
õ Retested 30 days later using the
PHP1; all tested hormones
xiwithin acceptable limits.
Topical Dermal
Progesterone Overdosing Case Study 3
Purpose
To demonstrate the overdosing caused by presently available dermal
P1 creams & gels.
| Patient
Specific Data |
|
| Age:
49yrs Female |
|
| Last
Period: 3 1/2 yrs earlier |
xxx |
| Bone
density changes: Not available |
xxx |
| Initial
Symptoms: Extreme irratability, poor sleep habits, shortened perimenopausal
cycle, low libido |
|
| Treatment:
Patient was prescribed 1/4 tsp. BID of 10% P1 cream |
xxx |
| Outcome:
Control of all somatic symptoms, increased aggression and irritability,
with tender breasts |
|
| Lab
Report |
|
| Initial
Patient salivary hormone level |
Post
Therapy with Cream 9 months later |
| DHEA:
5ng/ml |
6
ng/ml |
| Testosterone:
21pg/ml |
26
pg/nl |
| Estrone:
50 pg/ml |
46
pg/nl |
| Estradiol:
9 pg/ml |
14
pg/nl |
| Estriol:
6 pg/ml |
8
pg/nl |
| Progesterone:
38 pg/ml |
4,600
pg/nl |
Topical Dermal
Progesterone Overdosing Case Study 3 (continued)
Background
The wide spread use of gels and over-the-counter dermal Progesterone creams
has led to an endemic hyperprogesterone state in women. The incidence
of P1 overdose (reflected in free fraction P1 elevations of 400% to 20,000%)
occurs within 95% of all users. The pharmaco- dynamics of the aforementioned
creams & gels is not well established. It is believed that excessive
subcutaneous storage followed by uncontrolled release is the underlying
problem. Overdosing occurs in a dose dependent fashion and can take anywhere
from 7 to 30 days with cream or gel concentrations of 20% to 1.5% respectively.
The clearance of P1 and return to acceptable levels may vary from 30 to
200 days.
Remarks
Breast enlargement occurred 3 weeks into therapy. Five and one half months
into treatment patient developed a progressively worsening depression.
Patient was given Paxil. No association to P1 cream use was made by patient
or doctor.
Case Management
Hormonal Aspect
õ Discontinued use of cream allowed
for a 75 day washout period.
õ Oral micronized P1 was given 35
mg bid of isomolecular Progesterone.
õ Patient was weaned off Paxil.
x((Abstract No. 8)
DHEA Challenge
Test in Breast Cancer Case Study 4
Purpose
To demonstrate the use of an objective assessment of DHEA conversion efficiency
to Androgens and Estrogens as a tool to estimate suitability and dose
of supplemental DHEA.
| Patient
Specific Data |
|
|
| Age:
52 yrs Female |
|
xxx |
| Last
period: 4yrs earlier |
|
xxx |
| Breast
neoplasm removed by lumpectomy 5yrs earlier, is considering HRT |
|
|
| Salivary
DHEA Challenge Test |
|
xxx |
| A
baseline assessment, followed by 15mg bid DHEA bid for 5 days then
a post challenge assessment is shown to the right: |
PM
Ranges (post menopause-no HRT) |
Post
Challenge Test & % Changed |
| DHEA:
2ng/ml |
3-10ng/ml |
25
ng/mlxxxxxx1150.00% |
| Testosterone:
19 pg/ml |
5-20pg/ml |
47
pg/mlxxxxxx147.00% |
| Estradiol,
E2: 9 pg/ml |
1-4pg/ml |
7
pg/mlxxxxxxx147.00% |
DHEA Challenge
Test in Breast Cancer Case Study 4 (continued)
Background
The conversion efficiency of DHEA to Estrogens and Androgens seems to
be a phenotypic expression. Short of overdosing a patient for a while
and observing the side effects, there is no clinical way to figure our
conversion disposition. The DCT removes the guess work and allows precise
prediction of patient disposition to supplemental DHEA.
Remarks
DHEA: Patient baseline DHEA value was depressed. Estradiol and
Testosterone levels are acceptable. The post challenge DHEA shows a distinct
and significant conversion to Testosterone with practically no
conversion to Estradiol.
Case Management
õ Patient was given low dose DHEA
4 mg sublingual solution
xitwice daily.
õ Repeat test showed normal DHEA with
no increase in
xiEstradiol & Testosterone.
|